default-placeholder

Logical Rejection of the Big Bang Theory

No doubt, science has contributed a lot, in many ways, towards the development of human lifestyle. But if we glance a little towards some interpretations of natural phenomena made by science we come to know them to be a bit weird.
Here, I am rejecting the Big Bang Theory on the basis of logical reasonings stated below. Since this article is based upon my personal thinking so any comment or opposing of ideas to prove my statements logically wrong would be appreciable as it increases the thirst for knowledge.

‘Sir James Jeans’, a well renowned writer, writes in his article titled as “THE DYING SUN”:

A view of big bang explosion

 “Some two thousand million years ago this rare event (coming of one star near another) took place, and that another star, wandering blindly through space happened to come near the sun. Just as the sun and the moon raise tides on the earth, so this second star must have raised tides on the surface of the sun. But they would be very different from the little tides which the small mass of the moon raises in our oceans; an immense tidal  wave must have travelled over the surface of the sun, at last forming a mountain so high that we can’t imagine it. And before the second star began to move away again, its tidal pull had become so powerful that this mountain was torn to pieces and threw off small parts of itself into space. These small pieces have been going round the sun ever since. They are the planets, great and small of which our Earth is one.”

Further he writes:
 “Gradually planets became cooler. In due coarse one of these cooling pieces gave birth to life. WE DO NOT KNOW HOW, WHEN OR WHY THIS HAPPENED. It started in simple organisms whose living power consisted chiefly in their being able to reproduce themselves before dying. But from these humble beginnings came a stream of life which, growning ever more and more complex has in the end produced beings whose lives are largely centered in their feelongs and ambitions, their sense of beauty, and the religions in which lie their highest hopes and noblest desires.”
This assumption was the base of big bang theory. If you have got a questioning mind, surely, several questions will arise in your mind after reading this theory about the creation of the universe.
I am couting some of them below:

Q.1: As big bang theory states that planets started to encircle with a constant speed after the big bang blast, I ask that from where the inititing speed came..??? Does’nt it disobey Law of Conservation of Energy?

Q.2: How could planets attain exactly elliptical shapes if they were broken pieces of sun..???

Q.3: The line of the author couted above (in bold, capital letters) proves the limitation of human mind and proves a logical thinker to be a well-frog. The question is, how can anything come into existance from nothingness??? Ponder upon the complexities and structure of human body. How could such a complex piece of creativity come into being on its own???

Probable Answer to the above Questions:
If anyone of us says that any electrical machine will come into existance on its own, or he says that place all the spare parts of a vehicle on an area, they themselves will join them to become a vehicle, then we will suggest him to go to Psychatrist to get himself checked mentally and physically.
Similarly, In the case of Big Bang Explosion, if any theorist gives a theory that life came into existance on its own without any supereme power involved, or without any creator, we should ask him too to get himself mentally checked.

Therefore, according to my observation:
BEHIND THE CREATION OF THE UNIVERSE, EXISTANCE OF SUCH GREAT INTELLECTUAL CREATURES AS HUMAN BEINGS, THE COUNTINOUS AND SUITABLE PROVISION OF WATER, FOOD, EDIBLES, GROWING OF TREES, OZONE LAYER EXISTANCE, AND SEVERAL OTHER SITUATIONS WHICH SUPPORT THE EXISTANCE OF LIFE, THEIR IS A GREAT PLAN. A PLAN THAT COULD NOT OCCUR ON ITS OWN WITHOUT ANY OUTER FORCE MAKING IT DO SO.
SO, THEIR IS A SUPEREME POWER, WHICH IS EXAMINING ALL THE CHECK AND BALANCE OF SO HUGE HEAVENLY BODIES, AND IT COULD NEVER BE HAPPENED ON ITS OWN.

Who could be this supereme power will be discussed in another article of mine.

If any person has some objection on my point of view, his comments will be welcomed by me.

Thanks for Reading…


You Might Also Like

Leave a Reply

2 Comments on "Logical Rejection of the Big Bang Theory"

Notify of
avatar
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Anonymous
Guest
I don’t know if there was a big bang or not, but the probability of all the parts of a 727 being blown together by some wind or movement in nature to make the 727 is 1 in such an outrageous number it might be unimaginable. According to to the laws of probability it is remote, very remote but still probable. A guy flips a coin into a change bowl and it lands on its edge is highly improbable but it can happen. To say with absolute conviction that it cannot happen is to say that I know all the… Read more »
Bilal Shafi
Guest

This is the point when we have to go towards religion.
Because only God (the creator of the universe) can tell you how it was created and what is the purpose of our life.

wpDiscuz